Skip to main content

IWC | Archive
Menu Account
  • Admin Login
  •  Dash
  •  Featured collections
  •  Recent
Search
Browse

 Geographic search

 Advanced search

Powered by Powered by ResourceSpace
%BROWSE_INDENT% %BROWSE_EXPAND% %BROWSE_TEXT% %BROWSE_REFRESH%
Browse by tag
Featured collections
Workflow

This web application uses cookies and other tracking technologies to ensure you get the best experience.

View all results

SC/68C/HIM/02  

Full screen preview
Resource tools

Download this file

835 KB

Download

View directly in browser

835 KB

View in browser
  •  Share
Resource details

Resource ID

19123

Access

Open

Document Number

SC/68C/HIM/02

Full Title

Pinger trials in Norwegian commercial fisheries confirm that pingers reduce harbour porpoise bycatch rates and demonstrate low level of pinger-associated negative impacts on day-to-day fishing operations

Author

Andr? Moan, Arne Bj?rge

Publisher

IWC

Publication Year

2021

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to determine the effect of acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs, or pingers) on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) bycatch in three Norwegian commercial gillnet fisheries targeting cod (Gadus morhua), saithe (Pollachius virens) and monkfish (Lophius piscatorius). Catch data on 2,658 net-km-days were collected by 8 fishing vessels operating gillnets in high bycatch regions over two years. A total of 19 harbour porpoises and 9 harbour seals were bycaught, with all harbour porpoises and 67% of harbour seals taken in control (non-pingered) nets. Bycatch was modelled using a generalized linear mixed modelling approach and fitted with penalized maximum likelihood. Modelling results indicated that using pingers on gillnets reduced the risk of bycatching a harbour porpoise by an estimated 96.9% (95% CI 95% - 98%) compared to ordinary pingerfree nets. The effect of pingers was not significantly different between different fisheries. The pingers also had no significant effect on catch rates of fish (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.61) or harbour seals (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.25). Self-reported pinger-associated extra time costs on day-to-day fishing operations were low, averaging about 2.8 minutes per operation. These results add to a growing body of scientific evidence that pingers can lead to substantial reductions in harbour porpoise bycatch rates in gillnet fisheries, and that extra time costs associated with operating nets with pingers are low.

License management
Consent management
Related resources
Related featured and public collections
  IWC Scientific Committee / Scientific Committee Meeting Papers / SC68C | Virtual Meetings 2021 / HIM - Sub-Committee on Non-deliberate Human-Induced Mortality of cetaceans