This web application uses cookies and other tracking technologies to ensure you get the best experience.

Account Menu
  • Home
  • Featured collections
  • Recently added

Simple search


 Geographic search

 Advanced search

%BROWSE_INDENT% %BROWSE_EXPAND% %BROWSE_TEXT% %BROWSE_REFRESH%
Browse by tag
Featured collections
Workflow
Browse
View all results

SC/68C/ASI/02 

Resource downloads

Offline resource

N/A Request
Additional files

Original file27 May 21 @ 13:55

0 B Download

    Resource tools

  •  Share
Resource details

Resource ID

19043

Access

Open

Document Number

SC/68C/ASI/02

Publisher

International Whaling Commission

Publication Year

2021

Abstract

We report a new mark-recapture-based population estimate for the humpback whale Breeding Stock G (BSG), defined by breeding grounds on the northwestern coast of South America and southwestern Central America and feeding grounds around the Antarctic Peninsula and southern Chile. Photographic fluke catalogs from 23 research groups working in both breeding and feeding areas were compiled in the largest photo-ID matching effort ever made for this stock. A total of 6,354 unique individuals including 1,698 (26.7%) from feeding areas and 4,656 (73.3%) from breeding areas covering the period 1991-2018 were used for this purpose. The dataset was fitted to closed population models to estimate population size and Jolly-Seber models to estimate apparent survival, both implemented in the software Mark. Mixture models with two different data types, full likelihood and conditional likelihood, produced similar results of 11,784 and 11,786 (SE = 266 for both estimates) whales, respectively. In both cases, a model with two mixtures {Mth2} provided the best fit. Two Cormack-Jolly-Seber with Pledger mixtures models produced apparent survival estimates for the two mixtures (0.924 and 0.959, SE = 0.003 and 0.008; respectively). The new population estimate is 181% higher than a previously obtained in 2006. The annual rate of increase in the 27-year study period was 5.07%. Sources of bias were associated with effort heterogeneity, population stratification and the time scale. These and other sources of bias should be considered in future modeling estimates.

Search for similar resources