This web application uses cookies and other tracking technologies to ensure you get the best experience.

Account Menu
  • Home
  • Featured collections
  • Recently added

Simple search


 Geographic search

 Advanced search

%BROWSE_INDENT% %BROWSE_EXPAND% %BROWSE_TEXT% %BROWSE_REFRESH%
Browse by tag
Featured collections
Workflow
Browse
View all results

SC/68B/SH/01 

Full screen preview

Resource downloads

File information File dimensions File size Options

Download this file

1.6 MB Download

    Resource tools

  •  Share
Resource details

Resource ID

17382

Access

Open

Document Number

SC/68B/SH/01

Full Title

Sex ratios in blue whales from conception onward: the effects of space, time, and size

Author

Trevor A. Branch and Cole C. Monnahan

Publisher

International Whaling Commission

Publication Year

2020

Abstract

Mammalian sex ratios should be close to equality between males and females, or the rarer sex will on average produce more offspring. Deviations in this prediction across time, space, age and length may reveal insights into sex-specific growth, survival, movements, and behavior. For blue whales, extensive sex records are available for fetal (n = 21,542) and postnatal (n = 311,901) individuals from whaling records, and are examined here with a special focus on the Antarctic. Male blue whales are significantly more common than females in both fetal (51.3% male) and postnatal (52.1% male) data. Historically, Antarctic catches shifted from slight male-dominance before 1951 (52.4% male) to slight female-dominance thereafter (48.0% male), even though females are larger and were hence preferentially selected by whalers. Subtle daily shifts in sex ratios were observed at the three land stations with the greatest catches, with statistical evidence for linear or sine wave patterns. Among land stations, temperate land stations in southern Africa caught fewer males (46–47%), South Georgia was evenly split among the sexes (50% male), and the southernmost stations in the South Orkneys (60% male) and South Shetlands (56% male), caught more males. Among pelagic catches, there were no clear spatial patterns in sex ratios, except that more males were caught in the Ross Sea. Fetal data yield evidence that the smallest females were misidentified as males, and that the proportion of males declines with increasing length, probably because of higher prenatal male mortality. After birth, sex ratio differs by length, with more males at intermediate lengths and more females among the longest individuals; this pattern is mimicked by a conceptual model in which females grow faster and to a longer asymptotic size. Overall, sex ratios in blue whales are remarkably close to equality across time, space, and length; with any deviations from equality explained best the larger sizes attained by females, together with size selectivity in whaling due to economics and regulations.

Related featured and public collections
 03 - IWC Scientific Committee / Scientific Committee Meeting Papers / SC68B | Virtual Meetings 2020 / SH - Sub-committee on Other Southern Hemisphere Whale Stocks
Search for similar resources